Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the efficacy and safety profile of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: Patients who have been on MHD for a period of at least 3 months were enrolled. Each subject underwent one HFR and one hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment. Blood samples were collected before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment to test uremic toxin levels and to calculate clearance rate. The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare uremic toxin levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), λ-free light chains (λFLC), and ß2-microglobulin (ß2-MG) before and after HFR treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints was to compare the levels of urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), P-cresol, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), leptin (LEP), hippuric acid (HPA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) before and after HFR treatment. The study also undertook a comparative analysis of uremic toxin clearance between a single HFR and HDF treatment. Meanwhile, the lever of serum albumin and branched-chain amino acids before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment were compared. In terms of safety, the study was meticulous in recording vital signs and the incidence of adverse events throughout its duration. RESULTS: The study enrolled 20 patients. After a single HFR treatment, levels of IS, λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, P-cresol, YKL-40, LEP, HPA, TMAO, ADMA, TNF-α, and FGF23 significantly decreased (p < 0.001 for all). The clearance rates of λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, LEP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in HFR compared to HDF (p values: 0.036, 0.042, 0.041, 0.019, and 0.036, respectively). Compared with pre-HFR and post-HFR treatment, levels of serum albumin, valine, and isoleucine showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), while post-HDF, levels of serum albumin significantly decreased (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: HFR treatment effectively eliminates uremic toxins from the bloodstream of patients undergoing MHD, especially protein-bound toxins and large middle-molecule toxins. Additionally, it retains essential physiological compounds like albumin and branched-chain amino acids, underscoring its commendable safety profile.

Clinical Efficacy and Long-term Prognosis of High Flux Hemodialysis Combined with Different Frequency Hemodiafiltration in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Uremia.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the clinical efficacy and long-term prognosis of high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) combined with different frequency hemodiafiltration (HDF) in uremic patients. METHODS: 86 middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia were divided into the HF group (HFHD combined with high-frequency HDF) and the LF group (HFHD combined with low-frequency HDF). The changes between the two groups in various indicators after 12 months of dialysis and the survival rate at 5 years of follow-up were compared. We used SPSS 25.0 software for data analysis. RESULTS: The differences of the levels of serum albumin, hemoglobin and transferrin in HF Group was significantly higher than LF Group before and after treatment (P < .05). The differences of the levels and clearance rate of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, ß2-microglobulin and cysteine protease inhibitor C in the patients' blood after dialysis were significantly higher in HF Group than in LF Group (P < .05). The all-cause mortality rate, new cardiovascular event rate, new cerebrovascular event rate, and new infection event rate of HF Group were significantly lower than those of LFHD group, respectively (P < .05). The LF Group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality events, new cardiovascular cerebrovascular and infectious events than the HF Group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: 1 week/time HDF combined with HFHD can more effectively eliminate the vascular related toxins in middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia, improve their nutritional status, treatment effect, and long-term prognosis.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7864.

Anti-inflammatory effect of high flux dialyzer surface area 2.6m2 in high flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

Dialysis therapy has remarkably evolved through the innovation in dialyzers and hemodialysis modalities, enhancing patients' quality of life. The efficacy of dialysis can be determined by measuring the reduction ratio (RR) of middle molecules such as Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Procalcitonin. In our study, we tested a high-flux dialyzer, BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 HF, with a surface area (SA) of 2.6 m2, in terms of IL-6 and Procalcitonin removal while performing high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). This crossover study comprised 25 patients who received a session of HF-HD using the BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 H, followed by a session of post-dilution OL-HDF. A washout period of 2 weeks was instilled between the two sessions, during which the patients received HF-HD using high-flux dialyzers (maximum SA 2.0 m2). All patients' pre/post dialysis concentrations of IL-6 and procalcitonin were measured. The dialyzer used in this study resulted in a significant IL-6 RR of 44.92±5.11% (p <0.001) with HDF and 32.48±5.72% (p <0.001) with HF-HD; and a procalcitonin RR of 50.32±3.94% (p <0.001) with HDF and 41.80±4.32% (p <0.001) with HF-HD. In conclusion, the dialyzer BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 HF (SA 2.6 m2) is efficient in eliminating IL-6 and procalcitonin, especially with OL-HDF compared to HF-HD, with acceptable albumin loss in the dialysate.

Acute myeloma kidney and SARS-COV2 infection with dialysis need: never say never - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Older individuals with multiple comorbidities and especially patients with multiple myeloma are at higher risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. When patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are also affected by SARS-CoV-2 the time to start immunosuppressants is still a clinical dilemma especially when urgent hemodialysis is required for acute kidney injury (AKI). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an 80-year-old woman who was diagnosed with AKI in MM. The patient began hemodiafiltration (HDF) with free light chain removal combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone. The reduction of free light chains concurrently was obtained by means of HDF using poly ester polymer alloy (PEPA) high-flux filter: 2 PEPA filters were used in series during each 4-h length HDF session. A total of 11 sessions was carried out. The hospitalization was complicated with acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia successfully treated with both pharmacotherapy and respiratory support. Once the respiratory status stabilized MM treatment was resumed. The patient was discharged in stable condition after 3 months of hospitalization. The follow up showed significant improvement of the residual renal function which allowed interruption of hemodialysis (HD). CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of patients affected by MM, AKI, and SARS-CoV-2 should not discourage the attending physicians to offer the adequate treatment. The cooperation of different specialists can lead to a positive outcome in those complicated cases.

Improved ß2-Microglobulin and Phosphorous Removal with Expanded Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration versus High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Cross-Over Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) is expected to provide enhanced permeability of medium-sized molecules, selective solute retention, and better internal retrofiltration. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficiency for removal of ß2-microglobulin with 3 different extracorporeal therapies (ETs): high-flux hemodialysis (HF), online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), and HDx. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficiency of removal of other uremic toxins, including urea, phosphate, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-⍺, indoxyl sulfate, and p-cresol. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, and cross-over study was performed. Patients were randomized to determine the initial modality of treatment, each period lasted 4 weeks and between one modality and another, there was a washout period of 1 week. Reduction ratios (RRs) of different-size molecules and albumin were calculated for the different ET. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included, ß2-microglobulin RR was greater during both OL-HDF and HDx as compared to HF (RR 62% vs. 73% vs. 27%, respectively, p = <0.0001), and there was no significant difference between HDx and OL-HDF (p = 0.09). A decrease in serum phosphate levels was observed in the HDx and OL-HDF periods, contrary to an increase in HF (-0.79 mg/dL vs. -1.02 mg/dL vs. + 0.11 mg/dL, respectively, p = <0.0001). There was no difference in RRs of other molecules (BUN, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-⍺, indoxyl sulfate, and p-Cresol). There was no decrease in serum albumin in any ET. CONCLUSION: HDx provides enhanced removal of ß2-microglobulin and phosphate as compared to HF, and similar efficacy as with OL-HDF. HDx should be considered an alternative to chronic convective therapies.

Daily practice evaluation of the paediatric set of a next-generation long-term haemodialysis machine.

BACKGROUND: From 2006 to 2020, 24% of children starting haemodialysis in France weighed < 20 kg. Most new-generation long-term haemodialysis machines do not propose paediatric lines anymore but Fresenius has validated two devices for use in children above 10 kg. Our aim was to compare the daily use of these two devices in children < 20 kg. METHODS: Retrospective single-center evaluation of daily practice with Fresenius 6008® machines, and low-volume paediatric sets (83 mL), as compared to 5008® machines with paediatric lines (108 mL). Each child was treated randomly with both generators. RESULTS: A total of 102 online haemodiafiltration sessions were performed over 4 weeks in five children (median body weight 12.0 [range 11.5-17.0] kg). Arterial aspiration and venous pressures were maintained respectively over - 200 mmHg and under 200 mmHg. For all children, blood flow and volume treated per session were lower with 6008® vs. 5008® (p < 0.001), median difference between the two devices being 21%. In the four children treated in post-dilution mode, substituted volume was lower with 6008® (p < 0.001, median difference: 21%). Effective dialysis time was not different between the two generators; however, the difference between total duration of session and dialysis effective time was slightly higher (p < 0.05) with 6008® for three patients, due to treatment interruptions. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that children between 11 and 17 kg should be treated with paediatric lines on 5008® if possible. They advocate for modification of the 6008 paediatric set to decrease resistance to blood flow. The possibility to use 6008® with paediatric lines in children below 10 kg deserves further studies.

Pharmacokinetic profile of acyclovir in a child receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy for acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is one of the treatments of critically ill children presenting severe acute liver failure. This affliction might be induced by HSV infection requiring a treatment by acyclovir. Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) can alter its pharmacokinetics, according to its physicochemical properties and CVVHDF settings. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: The patient was a 21-month-old female presenting liver failure with hyperammonemia treated by acyclovir with presumed HSV infection. CKRT was initiated on day 1 with substantial replacement and dialysate flow rates (respectively 75 and 220 mL/kg/h). Acyclovir was intravenously administered every 8 h with a 1-h infusion of 500 mg/m2. Plasma and effluent concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to estimate the area under a curve (AUC) and CKRT clearance by 2 methods (one based on pre- and post-filter concentrations and the other one on dialysate flow rates). Clearance was estimated between 19.2 and 26.3 mL/min with the first method and between 27.6 and 44.3 mL/min with the second one. Concentrations were highly above the therapeutic index (peak concentration was measured at 28 mg/L), but AUC was appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This case describes acyclovir pharmacokinetics during CKRT in a pediatric patient treated by acyclovir. The patient was treated with adapted exposure with the usual dosing, but lower dosing should be investigated with complementary studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02539407.

In vitro analysis of factors affecting the continuous hemodiafiltration clearance of teicoplanin.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of sepsis, continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) and the administration of antibiotics such as teicoplanin (TEIC) are frequently performed in parallel. We aimed to clarify the factors influencing the CHDF clearance (CLCHDF ) of TEIC using a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane or a polyacrylonitrile and sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer membrane coated with polyethylenimine (AN69ST). We also investigated whether the adsorption of TEIC onto the hemofilters inhibits the adsorption of interleukin (IL)-6 onto the membranes. METHODS: TEIC, human serum albumin (HSA), and IL-6 were incubated with pieces of hemofilter membranes and adsorption rates were calculated. The CLCHDF , diafiltration rate, and adsorption rate of TEIC were calculated using an in vitro CHDF circuit model. RESULTS: The adsorption rates of TEIC onto the pieces of PMMA and AN69ST membranes ranged from 15.0% to 100% and from -10% to 5%, respectively. The adsorption rate of IL-6 was similar with or without TEIC. The CLCHDF and adsorption rate of TEIC under PMMA-CHDF depended on HSA, but not on effluent flow rate (Qe). The CLCHDF under AN69ST-CHDF depended on HSA and Qe. The observed CLCHDF under AN69ST-CHDF was similar to the predicted value (the product of Qe and the plasma unbound fraction). The observed CLCHDF under PMMA-CHDF was 2.0-7.8 times greater than the predicted value. CONCLUSIONS: Adsorption mainly contributes to the CLCHDF of TEIC using PMMA membranes, whereas diafiltration mainly contributes to the CLCHDF of TEIC using AN69ST membranes. TEIC adsorption might not affect the adsorption of IL-6 onto PMMA membrane.

Residual Renal Phosphate Clearance in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVES: Substantial levels of residual renal clearance and urine output may occur in patients treated with hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. However, the relationships among residual renal urea, creatinine, and phosphate clearances, respectively, and between clearances and urine volume have not been well described. METHODS: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study which enrolled hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration patients with a urine volume of >100 mL/day, in whom at least 2 residual renal clearances were obtained over a 6-month observation period. Urine was collected for 24 hours prior to the midweek treatment session and concentrations of urea, creatinine, and phosphate were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (24 men, 14 women) with a mean age of 70.4 ± 12.4 (SD) years were included in this analysis. All patients were dialyzed 3 times per week with mean treatment duration of 243 ± 7.89 minutes. Twenty patients were undergoing hemodiafiltration and 18 patients high-flux hemodialysis. In total, 102 dialysis sessions, of which 52 were hemodiafiltration, and urine collections were analyzed. Mean urine volume was 457 ± 254 mL per 24 hours. Residual renal clearance rates of urea (Kr Urea), creatinine (Kr Cr), and phosphate (Kr Phos) were 1.60 ± 0.979, 4.69 ± 3.79, and 1.98 ± 1.36 mL/minute, respectively. Mean ratios of Kr Cr/Kr Urea, Kr Phos/Kr Urea, and Kr Phos/Kr Cr were 2.83 ± 1.21, 1.23 ± 0.387, and 0.477 ± 0.185, respectively. There was a modest correlation between Kr Phos and daily urine volume (r = 0.605, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In maintenance hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration patients, residual renal phosphate clearance is approximately 23% higher than residual renal urea clearance. Urine volume is a modestly accurate surrogate for estimating residual renal phosphate clearance, but only when urine volume is <300 mL/day.

[Three cases of hemodiafiltration for the treatment of CAR-T related grade 3 - 4 cytokine release syndrome after ineffective treatment with IL-6 receptor inhibitors].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of hemodiafiltration (HDF) in treating CAR-T related grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome after ineffective treatment with IL-6 receptor inhibitors. Methods: Between July 2015 and July 2021, retrospective analysis of hemodiafiltration for the treatment of 3 patients, including 2 cases of acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia and 1 case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with grade 3-4 CRS after CAR-T cell therapy and ineffective treatment with IL-6 receptor inhibitor was carried out. Results: The patient's clinical symptoms, including body temperature, blood pressure, and blood oxygen, were relieved within 12 hours of all treatments, and the cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, INF-γ) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased significantly. No adverse side effects were observed during the follow-up period of 3 months. Conclusion: HDF can be a safe and feasible method to treat CAR-T related grade 3- 4 CRS after ineffective treatment with IL-6 receptor inhibitors.

Comparison of measured vs kinetic-model predicted phosphate removal during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: To what extent hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves management of hyperphosphatemia over hemodialysis (HD) is a subject of ongoing investigation. METHODS: We modified a previously described phosphate kinetic model to include incorporation of EUDIAL recommended equations for hemodiafiltration (HDF) clearance. We used the model to predict the recovery of phosphate from spent dialysate/hemofiltrate and compared this with averaged data from five published studies. Mean study average predialysis serum phosphate was 1.81 ± 0.20 mmol/L. Session length was close to 240 min per treatment. All HDF was done postdilution, at an average rate of 65 ± 24 mL/min. RESULTS: Measured mean phosphate removal was 1039 ± 136 mg (33.5 ± 4.41 mmol, slightly lower than the model-predicted mean value of 1092 ± 127 mg (35.3 ± 4.09 mmol). The measured ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.15 ± 0.22, ranging from 1.01 to 1.44. Using mean study input parameters for patient size and treatment characteristics, the predicted ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.095 ± 0.029, ranging from 1.05 to 1.13. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of EUDIAL-recommended convective clearance equations to a phosphate kinetic model predicts a 10% or greater benefit in terms of phosphate removal for HDF compared with HD at typical dialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment settings. These predictions are similar to the HDF advantage reported in the literature in studies where phosphate removal has been measured in spent dialysate.

The high-volume haemodiafiltration vs high-flux haemodialysis registry trial (H4RT): a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-volume haemodiafiltration and high-flux haemodialysis in people with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis using linkage to routine healthcare databases for outcomes.

BACKGROUND: More than a third of the 65,000 people living with kidney failure in the UK attend a dialysis unit 2-5 times a week to have their blood cleaned for 3-5 h. In haemodialysis (HD), toxins are removed by diffusion, which can be enhanced using a high-flux dialyser. This can be augmented with convection, as occurs in haemodiafiltration (HDF), and improved outcomes have been reported in people who are able to achieve high volumes of convection. This study compares the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of high-volume HDF compared with high-flux HD in the treatment of kidney failure. METHODS: This is a UK-based, multi-centre, non-blinded randomised controlled trial. Adult patients already receiving HD or HDF will be randomised 1:1 to high-volume HDF (aiming for 21+ L of substitution fluid adjusted for body surface area) or high-flux HD. Exclusion criteria include lack of capacity to consent, life expectancy less than 3 months, on HD/HDF for less than 4 weeks, planned living kidney donor transplant or home dialysis scheduled within 3 months, prior intolerance of HDF and not suitable for high-volume HDF for other clinical reasons. The primary outcome is a composite of non-cancer mortality or hospital admission with a cardiovascular event or infection during follow-up (minimum 32 months, maximum 91 months) determined from routine data. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular- and infection-related morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness and environmental impact. Baseline data will be collected by research personnel on-site. Follow-up data will be collected by linkage to routine healthcare databases - Hospital Episode Statistics, Civil Registration, Public Health England and the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) in England, and equivalent databases in Scotland and Wales, as necessary - and centrally administered patient-completed questionnaires. In addition, research personnel on-site will monitor for adverse events and collect data on adherence to the protocol (monthly during recruitment and quarterly during follow-up). DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HD as compared to HDF for adults with kidney failure in-centre HD or HDF. It will inform management for this patient group in the UK and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10997319 . Registered on 10 October 2017.

Efficacy of Supra-HFR in Removing FGF23 and Cytokines: A Single Session Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Supra hemodiafiltration with reinfusion of the endogenous ultrafiltrate (Supra-HFR) is a dialysis technique used to improve uremic toxin removal in the range of the middle molecular weight molecules. Supra-HFR does not require the preparation and online infusion of high-purity dialysis water because it allows the production of an endogenous ultrafiltrate that undergoes detoxification through an adsorbing resin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the ability of Supra-HFR to remove fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 8 (IL-8), and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) after a single session dialysis in nine patients affected by end stage renal disease (ESRD). The same patients underwent a single session of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) to evaluate possible differences in FGF23 and IL-6 levels. RESULTS: A significant reduction in FGF23 was observed with both Supra-HFR (p=0.001) and OL-HDF. As for TNF-alpha and TGF-alpha, which were measured using Supra-HFR only, their percentage values were significantly lower at the end of dialysis than at the start (p=0.0028 and p=0.03, respectively). This did not change with post-dialysis rebound. Supra-HFR was found to have no effect on IL-6 and IL-8. Interestingly, the removal rate for FGF23 and IL-6 was similar to that observed with OL-HDF. CONCLUSION: Supra-HFR was not superior to OL-HDF, with suboptimal convective volume in the removal of the molecules tested, especially FGF23, which is considered a large middle molecular weight uremic toxin.

Hemodiálisis vs Hemodiafiltración en línea / Hemodialysis vs Hemodiafiltration online

INTRODUCCIÓN. La incorporación de nuevas tecnologías como la hemodiafiltración en línea, han mejorado parámetros metabólicos/nutricionales en los pacientes que se encontraban en hemodiálisis convencional; en la actualidad no existen datos registrados en la población ecuatoriana que se encuentra sometida a esta clase de tecnologías. OBJETIVO. Comparar la evolución clínico-metabólica de pacientes que estaban en hemodiálisis convencional y cambiaron a hemodiafiltración en línea, determinar si es favorable la migración de la terapia hemodialítica difusiva a convectiva y establecer si el cambio de terapia dialítica ocasionó resultados favorables. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio analítico retrospectivo. Población y muestra de 38 pacientes enfermos renales crónicos en terapia de sustitución renal modalidad hemodiálisis convencional que cambiaron a hemodiafiltración en línea, independientemente del tiempo de diagnóstico y tratamiento en la unidad de hemodiálisis del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, Quito-Ecuador, durante el periodo marzo 2016 a marzo 2017. RESULTADOS. Los efectos nutricionales y metabólicos pudieron denotar mayor ponderación de resultados favorables en la modalidad de hemodiafiltración. En la estabilidad hemodinámica y la dosis de diálisis se evidenció una leve superioridad en la modalidad de hemodiafiltración en comparación a la Hemodiálisis. En las dosis administradas de Calcio, Hierro, Eritropoyetina y Calcitriol no existieron diferencias significativas entre las dos modalidades de tratamientos. CONCLUSIÓN. El cambio de modalidad de Hemodiálisis convencional a Hemodiafiltración en línea fue favorable, y mejoró los parámetros clínicos/metabólicos de los pacientes que requieren terapia de sustitución renal.

INTRODUCTION. The incorporation of new technologies such as online haemodiafiltration have improved metabolic/nutritional parameters in patients who were on conventional haemodialysis; At present, there are no registered data on the Ecuadorian population that is subjected to this kind of technology. OBJECTIVE. To compare the clinical-metabolic evolution of patients who were on conventional hemodialysis and changed to online hemodiafiltration, to determine if the migration from diffusive to convective hemodialysis therapy is favorable and to establish if the change in dialysis therapy caused favorable results. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective analytical study. Population and sample of 38 patients with chronic kidney disease in conventional hemodialysis modality renal replacement therapy who changed to online hemodiafiltration, regardless of the time of diagnosis and treatment in the hemodialysis unit of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, Quito-Ecuador, during the period March 2016 to March 2017. RESULTS. The nutritional and metabolic effects could denote a greater weighting of favorable results in the hemodiafiltration modality. In hemodynamic stability and dialysis dose, a slight superiority was evidenced in the hemodiafiltration modality compared to hemodialysis. In the administered doses of Calcium, Iron, Erythropoietin and Calcitriol there were no significant differences between the two treatment modalities. CONCLUSION. The change of modality from conventional hemodialysis to online hemodiafiltration was favorable, and improved the clinical/metabolic parameters of patients requiring renal replacement therapy.

Prognosis and risk factors for cardiac valve calcification in Chinese end-stage kidney disease patients on combination therapy with hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular complications. However, limited data are available concerning the prevalence, clinical features and risk factors for CVC in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. In this study, we aimed to assess these parameters in Chinese ESKD patients receiving combination therapy with hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 293 ESKD patients undergoing combination therapy of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2014 to December 2015. CVC was evaluated via echocardiography. RESULTS: ESKD patients with CVC had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, aortic and/or coronary artery calcification, arrhythmia, heart failure and coronary heart disease; increased systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure; longer duration of hemodialysis and hypertension; reduced hemoglobin, albumin and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; and increased serum calcium and calcium-phosphorus product levels compared with those without CVC. Logistic regression analysis showed that increased dialysis duration (p = 0.006, OR = 2.25), serum calcium levels (p = 0.046, OR = 2.04) and pulse pressure (p < 0.001, OR = 3.22), the presence of diabetes (p = 0.037, OR = 1.81) and decreased serum albumin levels (p = 0.047, OR = 0.54) were risk factors for CVC. The correlation analysis indicated a significantly increased CVCs prevalence with an increase prevalence of heart failure, aortic and coronary artery calcification. CONCLUSIONS: CVC represents a common complication and a danger signal for cardiovascular events in ESKD patients undergoing combination therapy of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. The presence of diabetes, increased pulse pressure, long dialysis duration, hypoalbuminemia and high serum calcium levels were independent risk factors for CVC.

Continuous intradialytic amino acid infusion from the start of dialysis is better to avoid catabolism under the high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF.

It was reported that amino acid infusion during hemodialysis is useful for improving nutritional status. The optimal administration method of amino acid infusion under the high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF (HVPO-HDF) was analyzed in this study. Subjects were 10 patients on maintenance dialysis at our clinic. We performed high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF. We investigated two methods for administration of Neoamiyu® 200-ml total amino acid (TAA) infusion for patients with renal failure: (1) continuous infusion into the dialysis circuit for 4 h from the start of dialysis to its completion (infusion rate 50 ml/h) and (2) continuous infusion started 1 h before completion of dialysis (infusion rate 200 ml/h), and compared pre- and post-dialysis blood concentrations and leakage of TAA, essential amino acids (EAA), and nonessential amino acids (NEAA) between these methods. Pre-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. Post-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids were higher in all concentrations were significantly higher with continuous infusion starting 1 h before completion of dialysis. Leakage of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. The continuous intradialytic amino acid infusion from the start of dialysis is better to avoid catabolism under high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF.

Comparative efficacy between hemodialysis using super high-flux dialyzer with hemoperfusion and high-volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration in removing protein bound and middle molecule uremic toxins: A cross-over randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) using super high-flux dialyzer (HD + SHF) comparably removed uremic toxins to high-volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration (olHDF). Integration of hemoperfusion (HP) to HD + SHF (HD + SHF + HP) might provide superior uremic toxin removing capability to high-volume postdilution olHDF. METHOD: The present study was conducted in thrice-a-week HD patients to compare the efficacy in removing indoxyl sulfate (IS), beta-2 microglobulin (ß2 M), and urea between high-volume postdilution ol-HDF and HD + SHF + HP, comprising HD + SHF as the main treatment plus HD + SHF + HP 1/week in the first 4 weeks and 1/2 weeks in the second 4 weeks. RESULTS: Ten prevalent HD patients with blood flow rate (BFR) above 400 ml/min were randomized into two sequences of 8-week treatment periods of HD + SHF + HP and later high-volume postdilution olHDF or vice versa. When compared with high-volume postdilution olHDF (convective volume of 26.02 ± 1.8 L/session), HD + SHF + HP provided comparable values of percentage reduction ratio of IS (52.0 ± 11.7 vs. 56.3 ± 7.5%, p = 0.14) and ß2 M (83.7 ± 4.9 vs. 84.0 ± 4.3%, p = 0.37) and slightly lower urea reduction ratio. Despite greater dialysate albumin loss (p = 0.008), there was no significant change in serum albumin level in HD + SHF + HP group. CONCLUSIONS: HD + SHF + HP could not provide superior efficacy in removing uremic toxins to high-volume postdilution olHDF. The use of low BFR of 200 ml/min during the first 2 h of HD + SHF + HP session, according to the instruction of manufacturer, might impair the efficacy of the HD + SHF part in removing uremic toxins.

Contribution of diafiltration and adsorption to vancomycin clearance in a continuous hemodiafiltration circuit model in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin (VCM) is eliminated mainly by diafiltration under continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF), but the contribution of adsorption to CHDF clearance (CLCHDF ) of VCM using a polyacrylonitrile and sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer membrane coated with polyethylenimine (AN69ST) or a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane is unknown. This study sought to investigate the contribution of diafiltration and adsorption to the CLCHDF of VCM using AN69ST and PMMA membranes in vitro. METHODS: An in vitro CHDF circuit model was developed. The initial concentration of VCM was 50 µg/mL and human serum albumin (HSA) was prepared at a concentration of 0, 2.5, or 5.0 g/dL. The effluent flow rate (Qe) was set at 800, 1500, or 3000 mL/h. The CLCHDF , diafiltration rate, and adsorption rate of VCM were calculated. RESULTS: Total CLCHDF of VCM using the AN69ST membrane increased and decreased with increasing Qe and HSA concentration, respectively. Diafiltration and adsorption rates were 82.1 ± 9.8% and 12.1 ± 6.1% under all conditions, respectively. Total CLCHDF using the PMMA membrane increased with increasing Qe. Diafiltration and adsorption rates were 89.2 ± 20.4% and 4.6 ± 17.0% under all conditions, respectively. The observed CLCHDF values significantly correlated with the predicted CLCHDF , calculated according to a previous study as the product of Qe and the plasma unbound fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Diafiltration predominantly contributed to CLCHDF of VCM using AN69ST and PMMA membranes. When diafiltration rather than adsorption mainly contributes to the CLCHDF of VCM, the CLCHDF could be predicted from the Qe and HSA concentration, at least in vitro.

Management of acute kidney injury in frail patients with biopsy-proven cast nephropathy: a combined approach with chemotherapy plus Supra-hemodiafiltration with post-adsorption endogenous reinfusion.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma often have kidney involvement with acute kidney injury which is frequently due to cast nephropathy. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) allows removal from the circulation of significant amounts of free light chains (FLCs) responsible for tubular damage. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2018, 13 patients affected by multiple myeloma (64% λ chain and 36% k), including 10 cases with biopsy-proven cast nephropathy, were treated with this technique. Each patient had high free light chains levels at diagnosis: median 8586 mg/l for λ and 4200 mg/l for k, and stage III acute kidney injury (median serum creatinine 7.5 mg/dl). We initially performed daily HFR-Supra sessions and then modulated them based on renal response (mean 10 sessions/patient). At the same time, the patients also received various chemotherapy regimens, depending on their hematological criteria. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of patients showed at least partial renal function recovery within the third month, thus allowing dialysis discontinuation; 38% remained on dialysis. Two patients died. The mean reduction rate of free light chains at the end of the HFR-Supra cycle was 85% (k) and 40% (λ), respectively. Serum albumin remained stable during the whole treatment. DISCUSSION: In our experience, the synergistic effect of chemotherapy and HFR-Supra led to a recovery of renal function in 6 out of 13 patients presenting with severe dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury. HFR-Supra allowed stable albumin levels, with high free light chains removal rate, at a relatively low costs.

Effect of Expanded Hemodialysis with Theranova® in Patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Cytokine storm control is the main target for improving severe COVID-19 by using immunosuppressive treatment. Effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) could give us an advantage removing cytokines in patients with RRT requirements superimposed on COVID-19. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in COVID-19 patients who required hemodialysis (HD). Patients were assigned to online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and expanded HD (HDx) according to Brescia group recommendations. We measured several cytokines, ß2 microglobulin and albumin levels pre/post-dialysis and on 1st-2nd week. We compared levels among both techniques and control group (HD without COVID-19). RESULTS: We included 26 patients: 18 with COVID-19 on RRT (5 of them had acute kidney injury [AKI]) and 8 controls. We confirm higher cytokine levels in COVID-19 patients than controls and even higher in patients with AKI than in those with chronic kidney disease. Most cytokines raised during HD session, except IL-10 and TNFα. IL-10 was eliminated by any dialysis technique, while clearance of TNFα was higher in the HDx group. HDx achieved a deeper normalization of cytokines and ß2 microglobulin reduction. Mortality was higher in the OL-HDF group than the HDx group. DISCUSSION: Not all cytokines behave equally along HD session. The following characteristics should be taken into account, such as intrinsic kinetic profile during a HD session. HDx seems to get better performance, probably due to the combination of different factors; however, we did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size, dropout, and reduction of AKI incidence during the 2nd pandemic wave. CONCLUSION: HDx appears to provide better clearance for TNFα and ß2 microglobulin during HD session and associates lower mortality. We propose the HDx technique for COVID-19 patients with RRT requirements since it seems to be safe and more effective than OL-HDF. Further studies are still needed, but we hope that our preliminary data may help us in future pandemic waves of SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses still to come.